Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Canadian Tax Litigation

Keeping an eye on Canadian tax litigation developments.

open menu close menu

Canadian Tax Litigation

  • Home
  • About us

ConocoPhillips: FCA Confirms Tax Court’s Jurisdiction to Determine Questions of Timing and the Validity of a Notice of Objection

By Larry Nevsky
January 15, 2015
  • 18.5 of Federal Courts Act
  • Administration and Enforcement
  • Advocacy
  • Appeals
  • Federal Court
  • Federal Court of Appeal
  • Judicial Review
  • Objections
  • Tax Court of Canada
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

In ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp. v. The Queen (2014 FCA 297), the Federal Court of Appeal overturned a Federal Court decision (2013 FC 1192) and dismissed an application for judicial review by the taxpayer finding that the Federal Court lacked jurisdiction in this case.

ConocoPhillips had commenced an application for judicial review as a result of a dispute between the CRA about whether a Notice of Reassessment had been validly sent to the taxpayer.  The CRA alleged that it mailed a Notice of Reassessment on November 7, 2008. ConocoPhillips alleged that it never received the Notice of Reassessment and that it first learned of the reassessment on April 14, 2010.

Accordingly, when ConocoPhillips filed a Notice of Objection on June 7, 2010, the CRA advised that it would not consider the objection on the grounds that it was not filed within 90 days of the alleged mailing date (i.e., November 7, 2008) and that no request for an extension of time was made within the year following the alleged mailing date of the reassessment.

The Federal Court considered the question of jurisdiction and found that it had jurisdiction because the Court was not being asked to consider the validity of the reassessment (which can only be determined by the Tax Court of Canada) but rather, was only being asked to review the CRA’s decision not to consider the objection.

Based on the standard of reasonableness, the Federal Court found in favour of ConocoPhillips on the basis that the CRA had not sufficiently engaged the evidence to appropriately render an opinion whether or not the reassessment was mailed on the alleged date. The Court set aside that decision.

The Crown appealed to the Federal Court of Appeal on the basis that the Federal Court lacked jurisdiction on this issue.  The Federal Court of Appeal allowed the appeal.

Section 18.5 of the Federal Courts Act provides that judicial review in the Federal Court is not available where, inter alia, an appeal is permitted on the issue before the Tax Court of Canada.  In the present case, the Federal Court of Appeal stated that, pursuant to subsection 169(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act (Canada), ConocoPhillips could have appealed to the Tax Court after 90 days had elapsed following the date its objection was initially filed and the Tax Court would have been the correct forum to determine if, or when, the Notice of Reassessment was mailed and when the time for filing a Notice of Objection expired.

The Federal Court of Appeal clarified that the Minister’s obligation to consider a Notice of Objection is triggered regardless of whether a Notice of Objection may have been filed within the required time-frame. Further, the Minister’s decision on this issue is not an impediment to filing an appeal to the Tax Court pursuant to paragraph 169(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act (Canada). Accordingly, judicial review of this issue was not available in the Federal Court.

Canada Revenue Agency, Federal Court of Appeal, Income Tax Act, Tax Court of Canada
Larry Nevsky

About Larry Nevsky

Larry Nevsky is a partner in Dentons’ national Tax group in Toronto, where he focuses on all aspects of income tax and corporate tax planning. With his comprehensive background as both a lawyer and a chartered professional accountant, Larry operates a thriving practice advising domestic and international clients on a wide range of tax-related matters, including mergers and acquisitions, corporate reorganizations, corporate finance, business structuring, inbound and outbound expansion, cross-border transactions and tax dispute resolution.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Discovery
  • Federal Court of Appeal
  • Processes

Ahamed v Canada – FCA Clarifies the Scope of Document Discovery in Tax Appeals

By Natalie Tomaszczyk (Articling Student)
  • Administration and Enforcement
  • Books and Records
  • Canada Revenue Agency
  • Privilege

BP Canada: CRA Entitled to Tax Accrual Working Papers

By Larry Nevsky
  • Administration and Enforcement
  • Canada Revenue Agency
  • Voluntary Disclosure

The Canada Revenue Agency’s Voluntary Disclosure Program: Current Processing Issues

By Cheryl Gibson

About Dentons

Dentons is the world’s largest law firm, delivering quality and value to clients around the globe. Dentons is a leader on the Acritas Global Elite Brand Index, a BTI Client Service 30 Award winner and recognized by prominent business and legal publications for its innovations in client service, including founding Nextlaw Labs and the Nextlaw Global Referral Network. Dentons’ polycentric approach and world-class talent challenge the status quo to advance client interests in the communities in which we live and work. www.dentons.com.

Twitter

Categories

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

COVID-19 Global Tax Tracker
Dentons logo

© 2021 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site